Also spent from the $50 million award was $96,000 for the Mecosta County Road Commission to work on road engineering; and $333,900 for grant administration by The Right Place. The unspent balance of the $50 million as of Sept. 30 was $27.4 million, while the funds earned $3.3 million in interest.
Gotion has said it didn’t abandon the project, but it couldn’t move it forward
amid litigation with Green Charter Township over its plans to build on 270 acres.
Kunse, whose district includes the township, appeared before the committee to implore lawmakers to investigate the transfer and whether the state could foreclose on the property. He said he worries that a California bank appears to hold a lien on at least part of the property.
The MEDC told Bridge it continues to work with Gotion and that it hopes to recoup funds amicably and avoid a foreclosure.
“Gotion cannot sell or transfer the land without the approval of the Michigan Strategic Fund based on their agreement with the state,” spokesperson Danielle Emerson said.
Ultimately, Emerson said, the strategic fund “could take title of the property if it is unable to recoup the funds used to reimburse for the purchase of the land.”
The property, Kunse said, “is only worth $6 million.”
Rep. Joseph Fox, R-Fremont, also spoke at the 90-minute hearing, following criticism of the state’s economic development deals by John Mozena, president of the Center for Economic Accountability.
He said the silence behind megadeals such as Gotion “almost invariably creates tension between what’s best for the people managing the project on behalf of the public and what’s best for the public.”
Fox said the Big Rapids area protesters against Gotion plan a celebration this weekend over the end of the project.
Many felt disregarded when they raised concerns about the project, he said, echoing earlier testimony about communities feeling like big projects are foisted upon them.
Meanwhile, Kunse said he also wants Green Charter Township to receive compensation for its legal fees after Gotion sued the township for blocking an extension of water lines that a previous board — ousted in the 2023 election — approved in a development agreement.
The resulting legal battle stalled the project and put the company’s plans in a spotlight as the community and opponents across the state questioned Michigan’s spending on the factory.
Kunse had sought $275,000 for the township in earmark funding, but the request did not make it into the final budget.
The township, Kunse said, “is the pointy end of the spear. They were leading the fight.”
Business Watch
Covering the intersection of business and policy, and informing Michigan employers and workers on the long road back from coronavirus.
Thanks to our Business Watch sponsors.
Support Bridge’s nonprofit civic journalism. Donate today.
This must be the credit given on each article: Put at bottom of each article in small print
“This story was originally published by Bridge Michigan (bridgemi.com), a nonprofit and nonpartisan news organization. To get regular coverage from Bridge Michigan, sign up for a free Bridge Michigan newsletter here (https://bit.ly/BridgeMichiganNewsletter).”
Use photos as well and credit photos. Simply copy and paste name and put: Photo Credit: John Doe
